Trump says CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House
The president announced an immediate ban on Truth Social on 18 September, then told reporters in the Oval Office that he does not want the three outlets in his office or on the grounds. Reporters from all three were still working at the White House that afternoon. CNN called any ban an illegal assault on the First Amendment.

Washington4 min read
Last updated
President Donald Trump said on Friday, 18 September 2026, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House, effective immediately. He made the claim first on Truth Social, the platform he owns, and repeated it later in the Oval Office. He did not name a single story that triggered the move. He called the coverage cumulative, and he said he was tired of reading it.
The three newsrooms kept staff on the grounds through Friday afternoon. Camera positions on the North Lawn stayed in use. There was no public order from the Secret Service or the White House Correspondents' Association withdrawing credentials. The gap between the post and the physical fact of the building is the story that matters, because it shows how far the announcement still has to travel before it becomes a working rule.
What Trump said, and what he would not specify
On Truth Social he wrote that he was banning "Fake News CNN, MSNOW and Politico from the White House as a result of their constant reporting FAKE NEWS." He added that media outlets should not be able to "constantly write or report FICTION and LIES" about the president, the administration, or the country. He warned that other outlets would follow.
Asked in the Oval Office what the ban meant in practice, he called it "a very simple ban." He said he does not want those reporters in his office. He said he does not want them "here." He said the ban should go "as far as you can." He also said it could be lifted if the outlets "straighten themselves out." He mentioned the New York Times and the Washington Post as examples of coverage he called fake, without saying they were already barred.
He told reporters there was no particular incident. "It's really just cumulative stories over the past few years," he said. "You get sick of it." He added that he does not have to let them into "the people's house." Asked whether a court would accept that logic, he said a court should not allow what he called fake news to be written day after day.
How the three outlets answered
CNN said the threatened ban would be "an illegal assault" on a constitutionally protected right. A spokesperson said the network stands behind its White House team and called the reporting fair and accurate. Politico said it would "vigorously defend" its First Amendment rights against any attempt to restrict them. MS NOW, the former MSNBC channel, had no immediate public comment on Friday.
Lawyers who work on press-access cases have already flagged the obvious test. The White House is both a private workplace for the president and a public building that has housed a standing press corps for decades. Courts have generally allowed the government to set time, place and manner rules. They have been far less willing to let an administration pick which news organisations may cover official events on the basis of the tone of their copy.
The Associated Press has already spent months in litigation over earlier White House limits on its access. Friday's announcement sits on that same legal track. If badges are pulled, or if the three outlets are dropped from the pool that travels with the president, a judge will be asked to decide whether viewpoint discrimination is the real operating principle.
What remains unsettled
Three practical questions were still open on Friday night. First, whether hard passes will be revoked. Second, whether the outlets stay in the rotating press pool that covers movements, briefings and overseas trips. Third, whether the ban applies only to the West Wing and the Oval Office, or to the entire 18-acre complex, including the briefing room that the correspondents' association administers in practice.
None of those questions can be answered from a social-media post. Enforcement sits with the White House Office of Communications, the Secret Service and, for pool travel, the networks and wire services that share seats. Until one of those offices issues a written rule, reporters from the named outlets can keep walking through the Northwest Appointment Gate with the same credentials they held on Thursday.
The timing is not abstract. Midterm elections are weeks away. Trump's approval ratings sit near the bottom of most public surveys. Republicans are defending seats in states he carried easily in 2024. A fight with three national newsrooms gives him a familiar target. It also hands those newsrooms a First Amendment case they can take to court on Monday if the badges actually come off.
For now the building still holds the same mix of cameras and notebooks it held on Thursday. The president has said he wants that mix changed. The Constitution, the courts and the people who stamp the passes have not yet said whether they agree.
Continue reading
- News
Settlers kill Mashour Yassin, 51, at his home on the edge of Yasuf
Almanaque Digital DeskYasuf
- News
Pakistan says 22 fighters died in Kunar and Helmand; the UN counts 10 civilians
Almanaque Digital DeskKabul
- News
Tennessee pauses executions after Christa Pike survives two doses of pentobarbital
Almanaque Digital Desk