CENTCOM disables three Iranian tankers after missiles miss U.S. ships
On 5 September the U.S. disabled M/T Downy off Kharg, M/T Stark 1 near Jask and destroyed M/T Kylo in the Gulf of Oman. Adm. Brad Cooper called it a three-for-two reply. Brent held above $96.

Tampa2 min read
Last updated
U.S. Central Command said on 5 September that American forces struck three Iranian crude carriers after the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps fired ballistic missiles at a U.S. aircraft carrier and a guided-missile destroyer in regional waters. CENTCOM said both warships evaded the missiles and that no American personnel were harmed. Adm. Brad Cooper, the command's head, put the reply in arithmetic terms: if you shoot at two of our ships, we will impose an even higher economic cost, taking out three of yours.
The named ships were M/T Downy, permanently disabled off Kharg Island; M/T Stark 1, disabled near Jask; and M/T Kylo, also known as Noxen, an unladen tanker that CENTCOM said was destroyed in the Gulf of Oman after the crew was told to abandon ship. Officials said the strike mix included fighters and drones from both the Air Force and the Navy. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote that if Iran shoots at U.S. ships, the United States will sink Iranian oil tankers.
Kharg handles about 90 percent of Iran's crude exports. A strike near that island is a signal aimed at export capacity without, so far, a direct hit on the terminal itself. President Donald Trump has threatened Kharg infrastructure before. Saturday's action stayed on hulls that CENTCOM called part of a shadow fleet funding the IRGC and its proxies.
Iran's account differs. The IRGC said it had hit three oil tankers on an unauthorized route in the Strait of Hormuz and three vessels linked to the United States in other areas. On Sunday Tehran said it struck an unmanned U.S. vessel trying to enter the strait. Washington called that claim a total lie. Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the rules of the game had changed and that any further U.S. attack would meet a more painful reply.
Oil moved with the ships. Brent held above $96 a barrel and was quoted near $97 as Indian markets opened on Monday. GIFT Nifty pointed lower. Sensex and Nifty opened about 0.2 percent down. Vice President JD Vance had said later last week that U.S. forces were escorting traffic through Hormuz so that millions of barrels a day could still leave the Gulf.
The fighting sits on a six-month war in which talks have collapsed and both sides have chosen economic pain as a tool. CENTCOM earlier in the week struck about 100 military targets: air defences, coastal radar, mine layers and anti-ship launch pads along the strait. Saturday added a declared tanker-for-tanker rule. That rule is now the public doctrine, not an inferred one.
What to watch next is not another statement. It is whether a loaded tanker is hit inside the Kharg approaches, whether escort traffic through Hormuz slows in the ship-tracking record, and whether the unmanned-vessel claim produces wreckage that either navy can show. Until then the 5 September action is three named hulls, two missed missiles, and a price of oil that Indian equity traders were already pricing at the open on 7 September.
The escort policy Vance described is the other half of the story. If tankers still transit under U.S. watch, the market is pricing fear more than a closed strait. If AIS tracks thin out this week, the $97 handle will not be the peak.
Continue reading
- News
Bosnia expels two Serbian embassy officials after they attend Ratko Mladić's funeral
Almanaque Digital DeskSarajevo
- News
Von der Leyen puts €200 million behind an EU-Greenland package in Nuuk
Almanaque Digital DeskNuuk
- News
DAC clears Rs 1.10 lakh crore of buys, 98 percent tagged for Indian firms
Almanaque Digital Desk